Evaluations as moral judgements

It is likely that when we evaluate how well someone is performing, we also make a moral judgement from where they are, socially and economically. That someone from a poor background is judged as if they were somehow to blame for their background.

This is one of the many reasons that standardised tests, aptitude tests and other attempts at objective evaluations are necessary as we want to select those with the greatest abilities. Otherwise, it’s just corruption in disguise.

[…] when comparing students who earned the same results on a cognitive test, teachers judged poorer students as less capable. Again, this suggests that relying on subjective evaluations does more harm to poor students than relying on the more objective measure of test scores.
— Rob Henderson, “Don’t End Aptitude Tests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Other and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.