Dealing with the conspiracies

A group of scientists examined the “proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” and looked at the genome to see how it could have arisen. This inevitably dealt with a lot of conspiracy theories regarding the origin of the virus. The article is very technical, so someone took to Reddit to explain the key points:

It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of a related SARS-CoV-like coronavirus. As noted above, the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 is optimized for binding to human ACE2 with an efficient solution different from those previously predicted.

They’re saying here that if this was an engineered virus, the binding domain (the region of the virus that initially binds to a human cell and allows it to infect that cell) would be more optimized. COVID-19’s binding domain only sorta-okay binds.









This entry was posted in Other and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Dealing with the conspiracies

  1. Pingback: I was wrong | Henning's blog

  2. Pingback: The origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is still not determined | Henning's blog

  3. Pingback: The lab-leak hypothesis seems likely to be true, or: Why a technocracy is a nightmare | Henning's blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.